
Having survived a peremptory legal challenge and being banned from a university server within the first two weeks of our existence, the Los Angeles Review of Los Angeles suspects it's doing something right.
Highlights
- Vibe:Send us your best but less intimidating
- Response time: ?*/Editor reported data148 days*Chill Subs tracker stats
- Acceptance rate: ?*/Editor reported data?*Chill Subs tracker stats
Publication
Accepts simultaneous submissions
What's that?
When you can submit your work to multiple magazines at the same time
Accepts previously published
From the editors
Anthologies, Blogs, Defunct Mags, Only Appeared In Print, Other Lit Mags, Personal Websites, Social Media
What's that?
When the magazine wants to publish your previously published work. Requirements vary
Nominates for prizes
Active on social media
Available in print
Provides contributor copies
Has examples online
How to submit
Processs
Email
Cover letter
No cover letter advice
Eligibility
No specific eligibility requirements
Formatting
We don't have formatting requirements for this magazine
Author's rights
We don't have rights information for this magazine
Additional info
Weird and offensive shit. Polite banter. Stuff about LA. Doesn't have to be about LA, but that takes precedence. Shit, we don't even care if you've ever been to LA, although if you write 5,000 words about LA and you've never been here we would hope we'd be able to tell. We'll take reprints if they are not available elsewhere on the web.
Tracker statistics
16
Total submissions tracked
148 days
Average response time
Average acceptance rate
94 days
Fastest response time
Сhill Subs is able to provide internal statistics because you use our tracker! You're the best!
